This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
OpenLumin
AI retrieves evidence. You interpret.
Ask anything about Scripture. Every answer traces to a named work — and when the sources are thin, we say so instead of inventing theology. Free Bible research for pastors, students, and everyday Christians.
Hey Product Hunt 👋
I'm Kalib, a solo dev from the Philippines.
A while back I watched ChatGPT attribute a quote to N.T. Wright that Wright never wrote. It was confident. It was formatted like a real citation. It was completely invented.
That's when it clicked for me: millions of people are now asking AI to explain Scripture, and almost nobody is asking who trained the model or where the answer came from. Whoever controls the model controls the theology.
Meanwhile the tools you can trust — Logos, Accordance — run $120 to $10,000. For a pastor in rural Philippines prepping Sunday's sermon, that isn't a choice. The real choice is expensive-and-deep or free-and-unreliable.
So I built a third option.
OpenLumin treats the AI as a librarian, not a theologian. It retrieves from named scholars — Matthew Henry, John Gill, Michael Heiser, ancient Near Eastern context, Theographic data — and every claim traces to a source you can open yourself. It does not generate theology. That restriction is the product; everything else in the architecture exists to enforce it.
You can try it with no signup at openlumin.com/ask — ask anything, watch the sources come back with the answer.
It's free. Not free-trial free. Free.
Where I'd genuinely love your take: the hard problem turned out not to be retrieval — it's disagreement. When two credible scholars contradict each other on a passage, should the tool present both and stay silent, or surface the disagreement itself as the finding? I've rewritten that logic three times and I'm still not sure. Curious what you'd want as a user.
Thanks for taking a look 🙏
About OpenLumin on Product Hunt
“AI retrieves evidence. You interpret.”
OpenLumin was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 0 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #28 on the daily leaderboard. Ask anything about Scripture. Every answer traces to a named work — and when the sources are thin, we say so instead of inventing theology. Free Bible research for pastors, students, and everyday Christians.
On the analytics side, OpenLumin competes within Productivity, Education and Artificial Intelligence — topics that collectively have 1.2M followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how OpenLumin performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted OpenLumin?
OpenLumin was hunted by Karl Kenneth Alibuas. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of OpenLumin including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.
Karl Kenneth Alibuas