Migma AI

AI runs your email marketing. Better with every send.

Email

Analytics

Marketing

Visit WebsiteSee on Product HuntTwitter ⧉

email that improves every send is the dream 📩 congrats!! does it learn per brand?

Hello,

Congrats for the launch. 🎉

Since Zinn is a proprietary markup language, how do you ensure LLMs consistently generate valid Zinn instead of drifting toward standard HTML as campaigns become more complex?

"Better with every send" — this is the right framing. We run automated lifecycle emails and the hardest part isn't the first email, it's knowing when the 4th or 5th touchpoint actually moved someone vs annoyed them. Does Migma track downstream conversion signals (not just opens/clicks) to close that loop?

Curious how Migma AI handles the analytics side mentioned in the topic tags. Is the focus mostly on generating and launching email campaigns, or does it also help read performance after the send and suggest the next campaign? Email marketing gets much more useful when creation and learning from results sit close together.

the localization piece is what I'd poke at - Spain gets Spanish, Canada gets French or English, but does the consent model localize with it? GDPR wants a documented opt-in before you can send in the EU, CAN-SPAM is fine with opt-out after the fact in the US. if Migma is picking the send list and timing on its own, does it also know which legal basis applies per recipient, or is that still something the sender has to configure region by region themselves?

Congrats on the launch. The combination of Zinn plus real inbox and device previews feels like the more durable moat than generation alone, especially since the failure modes only appear after send. I am curious how the learning loop handles conflicting signals across localized versions: if a Spanish variant gets fewer clicks but higher downstream purchases, can the system learn toward revenue quality rather than optimizing the easiest top-of-funnel metric?

The drafts-the-campaign-before-you-ask angle from brand plus calendar is the part I would test for launch comms, where timing and segmentation matter more than the copy. When it builds the audience automatically, can I still hard-scope the segment — say only active community members versus a cold waitlist — or does it decide the audience for me? That control is usually the make-or-break for me before hitting send.

Congrats on the launch. The preflight checker that catches rendering issues across email clients and fixes them with one click is such a good detail, that cross-client mess is usually the most painful part of building emails. Curious how you're handling something like Outlook's rendering quirks under the hood, that engine has famously been a nightmare for HTML email for years.

The visual editor paired with real brand email examples is a smart combination. Starting from a strong reference and still being able to tweak every element feels much less limiting than a one-shot generator.

Building your own markup language is a bold move. At what point did you realize existing solutions weren't good enough instead of trying to work around them?

'First campaign should never be as good as your last" is the line the whole product can be built around! Most AI email tools stop caring the second the send button is hit. Curious about attribution on small lists... Does each account learn in isolation? Are you pooling patterns across accounts to get past the cold start? Congrats on the launch!

@Boey ignoring opens because of Apple Mail's privacy proxy inflating them is the right call, a lot of tools still pretend that number is meaningful. leaning on click-weighted credit across the whole send history rather than trying to nail a single journey makes sense too - single-path attribution was always going to be noise dressed up as precision. makes me want to see what a/b testing two subject lines on the same day-3 email looks like in your dashboard, that's usually where the click data would actually change what someone sends next.

the render consistently across inboxes line is the part i'd test first. outlook has wrecked more of my campaigns than any bad subject line ever did. does it hold up in the older outlook desktop clients or mostly the modern web ones?

Congrats on the launch @liam007! Being able to trigger and manage campaigns directly from Slack or Telegram sounds super smooth. Can we review and approve full campaign previews right inside those channels before they go live?

Direct emission is the ambitious version of this, so I'm curious what catches a bad token. When we tried it we ended up with a validate-and-retry loop, and roughly 1 in 12 generations needed a second pass, which is fine for a background job and painful when someone is sitting there waiting. Are you constraining the decode with a grammar, or letting it write freely and repairing after?

Big congrats team. Love that it factors in the calendar, not just brand and audience. Timing is usually the part founders get wrong, so having that baked into the drafts is smart. Excited to see this one grow.