The P9 AI Fluency Index gives you an explainable grade in ~12 minutes, along with clear recommendations on how to reach the next level. Based on benchmarks from some of the most forward-thinking companies like Ramp, Fin, Shopify, Zapier and Jobber.
One of the big challenges for many founders right now is to get their organization "fully AI-pilled". We've created this framework to give startup founders and CEOs a tool that helps them benchmark their company's AI fluency.
The benchmark companies (Ramp, Fin, Shopify, Zapier, Jobber) are all tech-native and heavy AI users. Curious how "fluency" is defined for orgs that aren't already in that lane. Does the bar shift based on industry, or is it a flat measure?
I think this is a good product to push the teams up to a new level. But is a sudden boost or sudden change really a good thing is debatable. I believe in small incremental changes. Because every company has its own parameters. When you change something(even an improvement) it comes with some drawbacks. To move forward you learn how to handle those drawbacks as well. It is like an evolution of an organism. But when you give a sudden boost with the help of AI (just like a black box that you dont know the inside) you may not be really ready to handle all the drawback that comes with it.
on the "too much AI" question - probably when you're replacing human judgment entirely instead of augmenting it
The gap between companies that think they are AI fluent and companies that actually are is probably wider than anyone wants to admit. Does it benchmark against industry or just give you an internal score? 
This is a useful framing because “AI fluency” tends to get reduced to tool adoption, when the real question is whether an org has changed its operating habits.
The part I’d be especially interested in benchmarking is where AI enters the judgment loop: are people using it only for speed/output, or also for critique, synthesis, decision prep, and preserving institutional context?
The teams that seem furthest ahead are not necessarily the ones generating the most content or automations. They’re the ones with clearer norms around what AI should never decide, what humans must review, and how good work gets evaluated after the model helps.
Very interesting. Is there a point at which it’s too much and you get negative points?
I'm curiouse: Where did thhis AI-pilled word come from? I often see it in people looking for devs these days.
Love the concept + not talking about the interactive website with a jumping pill! :D
About How AI-pilled are you? on Product Hunt
“Curious how AI-fluent your organization is?”
How AI-pilled are you? launched on Product Hunt on May 9th, 2026 and earned 236 upvotes and 12 comments, earning #2 Product of the Day. The P9 AI Fluency Index gives you an explainable grade in ~12 minutes, along with clear recommendations on how to reach the next level. Based on benchmarks from some of the most forward-thinking companies like Ramp, Fin, Shopify, Zapier and Jobber.
How AI-pilled are you? was featured in Artificial Intelligence (468.5k followers) on Product Hunt. Together, these topics include over 93.1k products, making this a competitive space to launch in.
Who hunted How AI-pilled are you??
How AI-pilled are you? was hunted by Christoph Janz. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Want to see how How AI-pilled are you? stacked up against nearby launches in real time? Check out the live launch dashboard for upvote speed charts, proximity comparisons, and more analytics.
Christoph Janz