Connect Google Search Console, Google Analytics, import your Ahrefs or Semrush lists, and crawl your site on 200-point technical SEO Audit. CrawlRaven joins all four and hands back a ranked plan: what to write, what to update, what to fix first.
Excited to hunt CrawlRaven today!
If you've ever done SEO for more than one site, you know the Sunday-night ritual: export from Search Console, export from Ahrefs, run a crawl, then spend hours stitching it all together in a spreadsheet just to decide what to actually work on this week.
CrawlRaven kills that ritual. It pulls Google Search Console, your keyword research imports, and a 200-point technical crawl into one place and turns them into a single prioritized action plan: what to write, what to update, what to fix first.
What stood out to me:
Issues are scored by ranking impact, so you fix the things that move traffic, not the things that are easiest to find
Cannibalization and content decay detection, which most tools either bury or charge enterprise prices for
White-label PDF reports, a big deal for agencies and freelancers doing client work
The pricing is refreshingly simple too: a free plan, and lifetime deals at $49 and $99 instead of yet another monthly subscription.
The makers Aditi and Rakesh have been in SEO for over a decade and built this to solve their own workflow. Congrats on the launch! Curious to hear from the community: what does your current audit-to-action workflow look like?
Pulling GSC and GA4 into one place is the part I always end up duct-taping together myself. Does the 200-point crawl check anything for AI search / GEO yet or is it still classic SEO? That's where I keep hitting walls lately.
The "what to do next" framing is the right one. GSC will tell you a page is "Discovered, currently not crawled" and then leave you guessing whether that's a technical problem or a site-quality problem. Does the ranked plan distinguish between genuinely technical fixes and pages that just need stronger internal links or better content? That distinction is where I've burned the most hours on my own site.
200-point technical audit is a specific number worth unpacking. Is that 200 distinct checks across categories like indexability, Core Web Vitals, structured data, internal linking, and so on, or is it more like a marketing number that counts variations of similar checks? Screaming Frog and Sitebulb also run extensive technical audits, curious what CrawlRaven's crawl catches that those tools typically miss or under-weight.
Congrats on the launch. Collapsing GSC, GA4, and a full crawl into one prioritized list is the time-saver here, three separate dashboards never gave anyone a single priority order. Before I'd hook this to a client's Search Console: does the OAuth grant ask for read-only access, or does it need edit/verify scope too, and if a workspace disconnects later, does that revoke the grant on your end or just stop the sync?
the 200-point crawl plus GSC/GA4 in one place is the pitch that matters - when a fix from the ranked plan goes live, does the tool re-check and clear that item itself or do you have to manually mark it done and hope it doesn't resurface next crawl?
Congrats on the launch team. This is super promising. Someone who has been diving into SEO this is going to be super useful
Congrats on the launch! Using real GSC impressions and position gaps to surface quick wins is super smart. How far down in rankings (e.g., positions 11–20 vs. 20+) does the algorithm look to identify those high-potential pages?
Congrats on the launch! Merging GSC, GA4, and crawler data under one roof to actually rank priorities is a huge time-saver. On the action items part - how does the model balance quick wins (like "low hanging fruit" keywords) Vs heavier technical fixes when picking the top action items?
the ranked what-to-fix-first output is the actual value here. every seo tool hands you 200 issues and lets you drown in them, the hard part was never finding problems, it was knowing which three actually move rankings this month. good angle joining gsc and the crawl to decide that instead of just showing it
Congrats on the launch! For agencies managing multiple client sites, can one account switch between different GSC properties, or does each site need its own separate account?
Raakesh, the ranking by impressions and closeness to page 1 is the part that caught me, because it also shows where a model like this can struggle.
I run SEO for a niche B2B product in healthcare. My highest-intent terms show zero or missing volume in every tool and barely register in Search Console, since only a few hundred people a month search them at all, yet those are the ones that convert. A prioritizer built on demand would push them straight to the bottom.
Can I weight a keyword up by hand, or mark a low-volume term as high-value, so the ranked plan does not bury the long tail a small market lives on?
Cool idea, agentic AI is definitely the future of SEO work. The whole product hinges on the ranking model. Is "ranked by ranking impact" a fixed weighting, or does it actually learn from what moved rankings on my specific site (or other sites.)
Congrats on the launch! The cannibalization detection caught my eye. I'd pay for that alone if it works well, because everyone knows two of your own pages end up competing for the same keyword, and nobody checks it regularly since it means exporting everything and cross-referencing by hand.
One question, what happens when the keyword list itself is stale? Does the tool flag keywords that stopped mattering, or does it take the list as given?
Upvoted, will try it on our site this week.
pulling GSC, GA4 and the Ahrefs/Semrush export into one ranked action list is the part that's actually useful, most SEO tools just dump the raw data and leave you to reconcile it yourself. does the ranked plan account for pages where GSC and Ahrefs disagree on ranking, or does it just pick one source of truth?
looks good, currently i m not using any seo tools like ahref so does it suggest keyword suggestions on which i should write on based on my GSC data or do i have add those keywords from my end and do u have any same report of any website where it shows what key actions or tasks it suggested based on my gsc and keyword data thanks
Congrats on the launch. Pulling GSC, GA4 and the crawl into one place saves a lot of time. How does the prioritization decide what goes on top? is it based on traffic potential, effort, or something else?
How often does it re-analyze new findings once I've worked on first few??
About CrawlRaven on Product Hunt
“SEO Hub for GSC + GA4 + a 200-point crawl”
CrawlRaven launched on Product Hunt on July 23rd, 2026 and earned 227 upvotes and 53 comments, earning #3 Product of the Day. Connect Google Search Console, Google Analytics, import your Ahrefs or Semrush lists, and crawl your site on 200-point technical SEO Audit. CrawlRaven joins all four and hands back a ranked plan: what to write, what to update, what to fix first.
CrawlRaven was featured in Marketing (466.3k followers), SEO (37.9k followers), Search (18.1k followers) and OpenAI Day (8 followers) on Product Hunt. Together, these topics include over 90.2k products, making this a competitive space to launch in.
Who hunted CrawlRaven?
CrawlRaven was hunted by Ayush Chaturvedi. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Want to see how CrawlRaven stacked up against nearby launches in real time? Check out the live launch dashboard for upvote speed charts, proximity comparisons, and more analytics.
Ayush Chaturvedi