This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
AccessiCheck
Find your site's accessibility errors in 2 minutes
Paste a URL, get your page's accessibility errors in 2 minutes — ranked by severity, each with its RGAA/WCAG criterion and a before/after code fix. In plain French (Europe's EAA applies since June 2025). Free scan, no account. €29 one-page report, €49 Pro (5 pages), €9/month monitoring. We never claim compliance: what no robot can test is published on the site. A diagnostic tool, not a certificate.
I'm Franck. I built AccessiCheck so finding your site's accessibility errors doesn't mean either decoding English technical jargon or waiting days for a consulting audit. Paste a URL: in 2 minutes, AccessiCheck automatically returns the errors a robot can detect — ranked by severity, each with the RGAA/WCAG criterion and the before/after code to fix it. €29 for one page, €49 for up to five, €9/month if you want it re-scanned every month.
That matters now because the European Accessibility Act (in force since 28 June 2025) and France's RGAA apply to far more sites than most owners realise. A full human RGAA audit is a multi-day job — and most small sites don't need the full version yet. AccessiCheck gives you the automatic half first; you only pay for a full audit if your situation really requires one.
Two things I did on purpose:
1. I published what the tool can't do. Screen-reader experience, full keyboard journeys, PDF contents — no robot can test those. That list is on the landing page and repeated in every report. "100/100" means no automated rule failed. It does not mean compliant, and I will never pretend otherwise. 2. I ran it on my own site first. It scored 87/100. I published the before-report, applied my own fixes, re-scanned: 100/100. The report is still online, unedited.
I'm a solo founder in Brittany, building this with AI agents that I supervise and re-read myself. French first, because the French-speaking market gets English tools and French regulation.
I'd love your feedback on two things: 1. Is "free scan → €29 report" a flow you'd follow for your own site (or a client's)? 2. What would make the report genuinely useful to hand to a developer — anything missing?
Happy to answer anything about the EAA/RGAA for small sites. Thanks for looking 🙏
About AccessiCheck on Product Hunt
“Find your site's accessibility errors in 2 minutes”
AccessiCheck was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 0 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #158 on the daily leaderboard. Paste a URL, get your page's accessibility errors in 2 minutes — ranked by severity, each with its RGAA/WCAG criterion and a before/after code fix. In plain French (Europe's EAA applies since June 2025). Free scan, no account. €29 one-page report, €49 Pro (5 pages), €9/month monitoring. We never claim compliance: what no robot can test is published on the site. A diagnostic tool, not a certificate.
On the analytics side, AccessiCheck competes within SEO, SaaS and Inclusivity — topics that collectively have 83.9k followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how AccessiCheck performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted AccessiCheck?
AccessiCheck was hunted by Franck Barrin. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of AccessiCheck including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.
Hey Product Hunt 👋
I'm Franck. I built AccessiCheck so finding your site's accessibility errors doesn't mean either decoding English technical jargon or waiting days for a consulting audit. Paste a URL: in 2 minutes, AccessiCheck automatically returns the errors a robot can detect — ranked by severity, each with the RGAA/WCAG criterion and the before/after code to fix it. €29 for one page, €49 for up to five, €9/month if you want it re-scanned every month.
That matters now because the European Accessibility Act (in force since 28 June 2025) and France's RGAA apply to far more sites than most owners realise. A full human RGAA audit is a multi-day job — and most small sites don't need the full version yet. AccessiCheck gives you the automatic half first; you only pay for a full audit if your situation really requires one.
Two things I did on purpose:
1. I published what the tool can't do. Screen-reader experience, full keyboard journeys, PDF contents — no robot can test those. That list is on the landing page and repeated in every report. "100/100" means no automated rule failed. It does not mean compliant, and I will never pretend otherwise.
2. I ran it on my own site first. It scored 87/100. I published the before-report, applied my own fixes, re-scanned: 100/100. The report is still online, unedited.
I'm a solo founder in Brittany, building this with AI agents that I supervise and re-read myself. French first, because the French-speaking market gets English tools and French regulation.
I'd love your feedback on two things:
1. Is "free scan → €29 report" a flow you'd follow for your own site (or a client's)?
2. What would make the report genuinely useful to hand to a developer — anything missing?
Happy to answer anything about the EAA/RGAA for small sites. Thanks for looking 🙏